The study undertakes a contrastive analysis of the morphological and syntactic aspects of Urhobo language and the Izon language, which are two indigenous languages spoken in the Niger Delta area in Nigeria. Contrastive analysis is used as the theory of preference to explore these languages, to show their similarity and points of divergence. The findings from the study attest to the similarity of these languages predictably as a result of their shared origin as they both are from the same Niger-Congo language family. There are cases of exact translations and linguistic interconnectedness between both languages in the morphological level. The study also confirms that there is noticeable difference in all levels of linguistics that makes both languages not mutually intelligible. The research’s implications include recommendations for language teaching and preservation as both languages are highly relevant for intercultural communication. The study also recommends that further research should be done in Nigeria’s indigenous languages as a way to respect and maintain unique linguistic identities. Scholars from different Nigerian languages should encourage the development and the growth of the indigenous languages to stop them from going into extinction. English language is the official language in Nigeria, it is the language of government, commerce, education, law, mass media and other areas of communication at the official level. The Nigerian language learner encounters so many problems in learning English. This paper reveals the importance of our indigenous languages.
Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 12, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.11 |
Page(s) | 104-110 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Ijaw, Urhobo, Language, Contrastive, Morpho-Syntax
[1] | Efe, E. C. (2021) Contrastive and error analysis Isoko l2 acquisition of English phonemes. International Journal of social science research and anthropology vol. 5 no. 6 issn: 2977-5745. |
[2] |
Ejaita, C. O. (2015), Contrastive tonal pattern in Urhobo and Ukwuani. Clems academy.
https://clemsacademy.wordpress.com/2015/05/14/contrastive-tonal-pattern-in-Urhobo-and-ukwuani |
[3] | Emenike, D., Asuzu, I. S., &Gboru, J. (2019). Language endangerment in South-South geo-political zone: A Focus on Ukwuani, Urhobo and Ijaw Languages. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 7(11). |
[4] | Fisiak, J. (1981). Contrastive Analysis and the Language Teacher. Oxford: Pergamon. |
[5] | Ganagana, D. E. P & Ogboru, L E. (2019). Contrastive Study of the Morphological Differences Between English, Izon And Isoko Languages”. International Journal of Innovative Language, Literature & Art Studies 7(1): 66-71. |
[6] | Gust, V. (2013). Contrastive analysis: theories and methods. In B. Kortmann and J. Kabatek (eds), Dictionaries of Linguistics and Communication Science: Linguistic theory and methodology. Berlin: Monton de Gruyter. |
[7] | Lado, R. (1957). Linguistic across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan. |
[8] | Obadon, M. I. (2016), Contrastive Analysis in Mbah, B. M. (2016). Theories of Linguistics. Nsukka: University of Nigeria Press Ltd. |
[9] | Opuidi, T. Irikefe (2016) A contrastive analysis of Urhobo and English prepositions. Journal of Inter-Disciplinary Studies on Contemporary Issues Vol. 2(1). |
[10] | Richard, J. C. & Richard, S. (2012). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Press. |
[11] | Sridhar, S. N. (1980). Contrastive analysis, error analysis and inter language: Three phases of one goal in K. Croft, Readings in English as a second language, pp. 91–119. |
[12] | Uzoigwe, B. C. (2011). Contrastive Analysis of Igbo and English Determiner Phrases in Journal of Igbo Language & Linguistics (JILL) No. 3. |
[13] | Wardhaugh, R. (1970). ‘The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis’. TESOL Quarterly. |
[14] | Williamson, Kay (2004). The language situation in the Niger Delta. The development of Izon language. Edited by Akpana, M. L. |
[15] | Uwasomba, B. U. (2020). Reduplication in Ikwuano Igbo. In Otuoke language and communication Review (OLACORE) ISSUES 5. Pp. 77-92. |
[16] | Uwasomba, B. U. (2020). The syntax of Headedness in Igbo. In Nigerian Languages’ Studies. Journal of the National Institute for Nigerian Languages. NILAS Vol. 4 No. 2. Pp. 208-215. |
[17] | Uwasomba, B. U. (2022). Anaphors in Ikwuano Igbo: Binding Theory Approach. In Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literary Studies (JLLLS). Vol. 2. No. 4. |
[18] | Uwasomba, B. U. (2023). The aesthetic analysis of idiomatic expressions in Amauzari Igbo: A socio-cultural approach. In Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literary Studies (JLLLS), Vol. 3. No. 1. |
APA Style
Uwasomba, B. U., Okiemute, A. (2024). A Contrastive Analysis of the Morphological and Syntactic Aspects of Urhobo and Ijaw Languages. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 12(3), 104-110. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.11
ACS Style
Uwasomba, B. U.; Okiemute, A. A Contrastive Analysis of the Morphological and Syntactic Aspects of Urhobo and Ijaw Languages. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2024, 12(3), 104-110. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.11, author = {Blessing Ugochi Uwasomba and Andrew Okiemute}, title = {A Contrastive Analysis of the Morphological and Syntactic Aspects of Urhobo and Ijaw Languages }, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {12}, number = {3}, pages = {104-110}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20241203.11}, abstract = {The study undertakes a contrastive analysis of the morphological and syntactic aspects of Urhobo language and the Izon language, which are two indigenous languages spoken in the Niger Delta area in Nigeria. Contrastive analysis is used as the theory of preference to explore these languages, to show their similarity and points of divergence. The findings from the study attest to the similarity of these languages predictably as a result of their shared origin as they both are from the same Niger-Congo language family. There are cases of exact translations and linguistic interconnectedness between both languages in the morphological level. The study also confirms that there is noticeable difference in all levels of linguistics that makes both languages not mutually intelligible. The research’s implications include recommendations for language teaching and preservation as both languages are highly relevant for intercultural communication. The study also recommends that further research should be done in Nigeria’s indigenous languages as a way to respect and maintain unique linguistic identities. Scholars from different Nigerian languages should encourage the development and the growth of the indigenous languages to stop them from going into extinction. English language is the official language in Nigeria, it is the language of government, commerce, education, law, mass media and other areas of communication at the official level. The Nigerian language learner encounters so many problems in learning English. This paper reveals the importance of our indigenous languages. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Contrastive Analysis of the Morphological and Syntactic Aspects of Urhobo and Ijaw Languages AU - Blessing Ugochi Uwasomba AU - Andrew Okiemute Y1 - 2024/05/10 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.11 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 104 EP - 110 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20241203.11 AB - The study undertakes a contrastive analysis of the morphological and syntactic aspects of Urhobo language and the Izon language, which are two indigenous languages spoken in the Niger Delta area in Nigeria. Contrastive analysis is used as the theory of preference to explore these languages, to show their similarity and points of divergence. The findings from the study attest to the similarity of these languages predictably as a result of their shared origin as they both are from the same Niger-Congo language family. There are cases of exact translations and linguistic interconnectedness between both languages in the morphological level. The study also confirms that there is noticeable difference in all levels of linguistics that makes both languages not mutually intelligible. The research’s implications include recommendations for language teaching and preservation as both languages are highly relevant for intercultural communication. The study also recommends that further research should be done in Nigeria’s indigenous languages as a way to respect and maintain unique linguistic identities. Scholars from different Nigerian languages should encourage the development and the growth of the indigenous languages to stop them from going into extinction. English language is the official language in Nigeria, it is the language of government, commerce, education, law, mass media and other areas of communication at the official level. The Nigerian language learner encounters so many problems in learning English. This paper reveals the importance of our indigenous languages. VL - 12 IS - 3 ER -